DNA methylation has become an essential molecular approach to regulate gene expression through the regulation of methyl group addition/removal at the 5th position of Cytosine. The T1 progeny of T0 transgenic wheat plants were used to study the transgeneration methylation of promoter proximal regions of two exogenous promoters using bisulfite sequencing. The progeny of low and high T0 IFS expressers with high and low methylation levels respectively were used. Results of this study revealed that T1 plants that have 35S promoter driving the IFS inherited the methylation status of 35S promoter and IFS expression, especially methylation at the -56 and -88 CpG islands. On the other hand, the high IFS expresser of T0 plants with OL promoter driving the IFS expression passed the same pattern of IFS expression and methylation to their T1 progeny, whereas the low IFS expresser of T0 changed the pattern of expression and methylation to the high T0 expresser in their T1 progeny. This indicates that T1 wheat plants were able to demethylates DNA of the OL promoter proximal region, especially at –106 and -151 and reconstitute the IFS expression from low to high expresser through one generation. This also could indicate that plant promoters are more suitable for driving transgene in plant biotechnology. Results will improve our understanding of regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation and their application in plant biotechnology.
Keywords: ransgenic, Wheat, methylation, transgeneration, epigenetic, DNA methyltransferases
Full text and supplemented materials
References
1. Lopez, C.M.R. and Wilkinson, M.J., Epi-fingerprinting and epi-interventions for improved crop production and food quality, Front. Plant Sci., 2015, vol. 6, p. 397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00397
2. Brautigam, K.,Vining, K.J., Lafon-Placette, C., Fossdal, C.G., Mirouze, M., Gutiérrez Marcos, J., Fluch, S., Fernández, M., Fraga, M., Guevara, Á., Abarca, D., Johnsen, Ø., Maury, S., Strauss, S.H., Campbell, M.M., Rohde, A., Díaz-Sala, C., and Cervera, M.-T., Epigenetic regulation of adaptive responses of forest tree species to the environment, Ecol. Evol., 2013, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.461
3. Akimoto, K., Katakami, H., Kim, H., Ogawa, E., Sano, C.M., Wada, Y., and Sano, H., Epigenetic inheritance in rice plants, Ann. bot., 2007, vol. 100, pp. 205–217.
4. Law, J.A. and Jacobsen, S.E., Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2010, vol. 11, pp. 204–220.
5. Zilberman, D., An evolutionary case for functional gene body methylation in plants and animals, Genome Biol., 2017, vol. 18, p. 87.
6. Han, S. and Wagner, D., Role of chromatin in water stress responses in plants, J. Exp. Bot., 2014, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2785–2799.
7. Jones, L., Ratcliff, F., and Baulcombe, D.C., RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in plants can be inherited independently of the RNA trigger and requires Met1 for maintenance, Curr. Biol., 2001, vol. 11, pp. 747–757.
8. Chan, S.W., Henderson, I.R., and Jacobsen, S.E., Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana,Nat. Rev. Genet., 2005, vol. 6, pp. 351–360.
9. Yong-Villalobos, L., González-Morales, S.I., Wrobel, K., Gutiérrez-Alanis, D., Cervantes-Peréz, S.A., Hayano-Kanashiro, C., Oropeza-Aburto, A., Cruz-Ramírez, A., Martínez, O., and Herrera-Estrella, L., Methylome analysis reveals an important role for epigenetic changes in the regulation of the Arabidopsis response to phosphate starvation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A., 2015, vol. 112, no. 52, pp. 7293–7302.
10. Ikeuchi, M., Iwase, A., and Sugimoto, K., Control of plant cell differentiation by histone modification and DNA methylation, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2015, vol. 28, pp. 60–67.
11. Demeulemeester, M., Van Stallen, N., and De Proft, M., Degree of DNA methylation in chicory (Cichorium intybus L.): influence of plant age and vernalization, Plant Sci., 1999, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 101–108.
12. Yaish, M.W., Epigenetic modifications associated with abiotic and biotic stresses in plants: an implication for understanding plant evolution, Front. Plant Sci., 2017, vol. 8, p. 1983.
13. Yaish, M.W., Al-Lawati, A., Al-Harrasi, I., and Patankar, H.V., Genome-wide DNA Methylation analysis in response to salinity in the model plant caliph medic (Medicago truncatula), BMC Genomics, 2018, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 78.
14. Fedoroff, N.V., Transposable elements, epigenetics, and genome evolution. Sci., 2012, vol. 338, no. 6108, pp. 758–767.
15. Takatsuka, H. and Umeda, M., Epigenetic control of cell division and cell differentiation in the root apex, Front. Plant Sci., 2015, vol. 6, p. 1178.
16. Suzuki, M.M. and Bird, A., DNA methylation and scapes: provocative insights from epigenomics, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2008, vol. 9, pp. 465–476.
17. Takuno, S. and Gaut, B.S., Body-methylated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are functionally important and evolve slowly, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2012, vol. 29, pp. 219–227.
18. Bird, A., DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory, Gen. Dev., 2002, vol. 16, pp. 6–21.
19. Saze, H., Tsugane, K., Kanno, T., and Nishimura, T., DNA methylation in plants: relationship to small RNAs and histone modifications, and functions in transposon inactivation, Plant Cell Physiol., 2012, vol. 53, pp. 766–784.
20. Zilberman, D., Gehring, M., Tran, R.K., Ballinger, T., and Henikoff, S., Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription, Nat. Genet., 2007, vol. 39, pp. 61–69.
21. Zhang, X., Yazaki, J., Sundaresan, A., Cokus, S., Chan, S.W., Chen, H., Henderson, I.R., Shinn, P., Ellegrini, M., Jacobsen, S.E., and Ecker, J.R., Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis,Cell, 2006, vol. 126, pp. 1189–1201.
22. Hauser, M., Aufsatz, W., Jonak, C., and Luschnig, C., Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2011, vol. 1809, no. 8, pp. 459–468.
23. Berdasco, M., Alca’zar, R., Garcı’a-Ortiz, M.V., Ballestar, E., Ferna’ndez, A.F., et al., Promoter DNA hypermethylation and gene repression in undifferentiated Arabidopsis cells, PLoS One, 2008, vol. 3, no. 10. e3306.
24. Matzke, M.A., Primig, M., Trnovsky, J., and Matzke, M.A., Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants, EMBO J., 1989, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 643–649.
25. Deng, S., Dai, H., Arenas, C., Wang, H., Niu, Q., and Chua, N., Transcriptional silencing of Arabidopsis endogenes by single-stranded RNAs targeting the promoter region plant, Cell Physiol., 2014, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 823–833.
26. Heilersig, B.H.J.B., Loonen, A.E.H.M., Janssen, E.M., Wolters, A.A., and Visser, R.G.F., Efficiency of transcriptional gene silencing of GBSSI in potato depends on the promoter region that is used in an inverted repeat, Mol. Gen. Genom., 2006, vol. 275, pp. 437–449.
27. El-Shehawi, A.M., Fahmi, A.I., Elseehy, M.M., and Nagaty, H.H., Enhancement of nutritional quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by metabolic engineering of isoflavone pathway, Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 407–417.
28. Elseehy, M.M. and El-Shehawi, A.M., Methylation of exogenous promoters regulates soybean isoflavone synthase (GmIFS) transgene in T0 transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum), Cytol. Genet., 2020, vol. 54, no. 3, p. 271.
29. Kim, J.H., Park, F.J., Lee, T.K., and Lee, W.S., Genomic sequences of the soybean 24 kDa oleosin genes and initial analysis of their promoter sequences, Mol. Cell., 1996, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 393–399.
30. Dai, Y., Ni1, Z., Dai, J., Zhao, T., and Sun, Q., Isolation and expression analysis of genes encoding DNA methyltransferase in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2005, vol. 1729, pp. 118–125.
31. Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A., and Allard, R.W., Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1984, vol. 81, no. 24, pp. 8014–8018.
32. Ahmed, M.M., El-Shazly, A.S., El-Shehawi, A.M., and Alkafafy, M.E., Antiobesity effects of Taif and Egyptian pomegranates: molecular study, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2015, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 598–609.
33. Li, Y. and Tollefsbol, T.O., DNA methylation detection: bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis, Method. Mol. Biol., 2011, vol. 791, pp. 11–21.
34. Carr, I.M., Valleley, E.M.A., Cordery, S.F., Markham, A.F., and Bonthron, D.T., Sequence analysis and editing for bisulphite genomic sequencing projects, Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, vol. 35, p. 79.
35. Goll M.G., Kirpekar F., Maggert K.A., Yoder J.A., Hsieh C.L., Zhang X., Golic K.G., Jacobsen S.E., and Bestor T.H. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Sci., 2006, vol. 311, pp. 395–8.
36. Jeltscha, A., Ehrenhofer-Murray, A., Jurkowski, T.P., Lykoc, F., Reuterd, G., Ankri, S., Nellenf, W., Schaeferg, M., and Helmh, M., Mechanism and biological role of Dnmt2 in nucleic acid methylation, RNA Biol., 2017, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1108–1123.
37. Jorgensen, K., Rasmussen, A.V., Morant, M., Nielsen, A.H., Bjarnholt, N. Zagrobelny, M., Birger, S.B., and Møller, L., Metabolon formation and metabolic channeling in the biosynthesis of plant natural products, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2005, vol. 8, pp. 280–291.
38. Liu, R., Hu, Y., Li, J., and Lin, Z., Production of soybean isoflavone genistein in non-legume plants via genetically modified secondary metabolism pathway, Metabolic. Eng., 2007, vol. 9, pp. 1–7.
39. Bucherna, N., Szabo, E., Heszky, L.S., and Nagy, I., DNA methylation and gene expression differences during alternative in vitro morphogenic processes in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.),In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.—Plant, 2001, vol. 37, pp. 672–677.
40. Tolley, B.J., Woodfield, H., Wanchana, S., Bruskiewich, R., and Hibberd, J.M., Light-regulated and cell-specific methylation of the maize PEPC promoter, J. Exp. Bot., 2012, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1381–1390.
41. Colaneri, A.C. and Jones, A.M., Genome-wide quantitative identification of DNA differentially methylated sites in Arabidopsis seedlings growing at different water potential, PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, p. 59878.
42. Lira-Medeiros, C.F., Parisod, C., Fernandes, R.A., Mata, C.S., Cardoso, M.A., and Ferreira, P.C., Epigenetic variation in mangrove plants occurring in contrasting natural environment, PLoS One, 2010, vol. 5, p. 10326.
43. Wang, W.S., Pan, Y.J., Zhao, X.Q., Dwivedi, D., Zhu, L.H., Ali, J., Fu, B.Y., and Li, Z.K., Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.), J. Exp. Bot., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 1951–1960.
44. Moritoh, S., Eun, C., Ono, E., Asao, H., Okano, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Shimatani, Z., Koizumi, A., and Terada, R., Targeted disruption of an orthologue of DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLASE 2, OsDRM2, impairs the growth of rice plants by abnormal DNA methylation, Plant J., 2012, vol. 71, pp. 85–98.
45. Cao, X. and Jacobsen, S.E., Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, vol. 99, pp. 16491–16498.
46. Kurihara, Y., Matsui, A., Kawashima, M. Kaminuma, E., Ishida, J., Morosawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Kobayashi, N., Toyoda, T., Shinozaki, K., and Seki, M., Identification of the candidate genes regulated by RNA-directed DNA methylation, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2008, vol. 376, no. 3, pp. 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.046
47. Song, Q., Zhang, T., Stelly, D.M., and Chen, Z.J., Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons, Genome Biol., 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 99.
48. Wei, X., Song, X., Wei, L., Tang, S., Sun, J., Hu, P., and Cao, X., An epiallele of rice AK1 affects photosynthetic capacity, J. Integr. Plant Biol., 2017, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 158–163.
49. Conrath, U., Molecular aspects of defence priming, Trends Plant Sci., 2011, vol. 16, pp. 524–531.
50. Kathiria, P., Sidler, C., Golubov, A., Kalischuk, M., Kawchuk, L.M., and Kovalchuk, I., Tobacco mosaic virus infection results in an increase in recombination frequency and resistance to viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens in the progeny of infected tobacco plants, Plant Physiol., 2010, vol. 153, pp. 1859–1870. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.157263
51. Hauben, M., Haesendonckx, B., Standaert, E., Van DerKelen, K., Azmi, A., Akpo, H., Van Breusegem, F., Guisez, Y., Bots, M., Lambert, B., Laga, B., and De Block, M., Energy use efficiency is characterized by an epigenetic component that can be directed through artificial selection to increase yield, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009, vol. 106, no. 47, pp. 20109–20114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908755106
52. Tricker, P.J., Lopez, C.M., Gibbings, G., Hadley, P., and Wilkinson, M.J., Transgenerational, dynamic methylation of stomata genes in response to low relative humidity, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2013, vol. 14, pp. 6674–6689.
53. Miura, K., Agetsuma, M., Kitano, H., Yoshimura, A., Matsuoka, M., Jacobsen, S.E., and Ashikari, M., A metastable DWARF1 epigenetic mutant affecting plant stature in rice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009, vol. 106, pp. 11218–11223. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901942106
54. Becker, C. and Weigel, D., Epigenetic variation: origin and transgenerational inheritance, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2012, vol. 15, pp. 562–567.